From: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Li Japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, 邱宇航 <iamqyh(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Transaction timeout |
Date: | 2023-12-29 11:15:00 |
Message-ID: | D9412036-76BA-4B31-8DB7-F7BE37CA0437@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 29 Dec 2023, at 16:00, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> After exploring the code, I found scheduling the timeout in
> `StartTransaction` might be a reasonable idea, all the chain
> commands will call this function.
>
> What concerns me is that it is also called by StartParallelWorkerTransaction,
> I'm not sure if we should enable this timeout for parallel execution.
I think for parallel workers we should mimic statement_timeout. Because these workers have per-statemenent lifetime.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2023-12-29 11:49:29 | Re: Add PQsendSyncMessage() to libpq |
Previous Message | Junwang Zhao | 2023-12-29 11:00:10 | Re: Transaction timeout |