On Oct 6, 2011, at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> +1. However, if that's the route we're traveling down, I think we had
>> better go ahead and remove the one remaining => operator from hstore
>> in 9.2:
>
> Fair enough.
Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?
Best,
David