Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 06:18:38
Message-ID: D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE395@voyager.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:04 PM
> To: Matthew T. O'Connor
> Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne; Greg Stark; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>
>
> Matthew T. O'Connor writes:
>
> > Absolutely! In addition, even if you don't consider win32
> a platform
> > to run production databases on, the win32 port will help developers
> > who work from windows boxes, which is the certainly the most widely
> > used desktop environment.
>
> At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend in
> exactly this case.

Yes, but how friendly is it?

Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2003-11-18 06:34:24 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-11-18 06:12:01 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?