From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeremy Hefner" <jeremy(at)meer(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: snort, acid and postgres |
Date: | 2003-11-17 20:42:26 |
Message-ID: | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE38D@voyager.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Hefner [mailto:jeremy(at)meer(dot)net]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 12:15 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] snort, acid and postgres
>
>
> Ok, so here is my problem. I am running snort with ACID as
> the query interface and FreeBSD with Postgresql 7.2 as the
> back end database system.
What kind of hardware is the FreeBSD OS running on? How much memory?
What sort of disk subsystem?
> The problem I am encountering is
> that it takes forever for acid to query the database and
> delete alerts.
How long is "forever"? That seems a bit vague.
> Also, there is no way to have more than one
> person query the database without having it crawl.
There are PostgreSQL database systems with thousands of simultaneous
users. Perhaps you can clarify your question a bit.
> Is there
> anyone out there that has experience tweaking postgres so
> that it performs faster in this setup? The database is out of
> the box with no tweaks to it.
Probably, some additional information would be helpful.
If you know the queries that you are sending, try an analyze to see what
sort of plan is used.
Have you done any vacuum operations on your database?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-11-17 20:50:43 | Re: embedded postgresql + C++ IDE |
Previous Message | Lynn.Tilby | 2003-11-17 20:39:02 | AUTOCOMMIT didn't work... |