From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
Date: | 2003-06-10 17:57:22 |
Message-ID: | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CDD41@voyager.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gearond(at)cvc(dot)net]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:57 AM
> To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> Cc: jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr; pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org;
> pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM
>
>
> all very good points. And I felt a little bit of bile in my
> mouth, myself, when I realized, several years ago, the true
> development and business model behind MySQL. Also, the
> HODGEPODGE way they added features from other development projects.
>
> But others are right. We need someone like IBM is to Linux,
> or Apple is to Konqueror. Someone who puts a lot of time and
> money into the product for their own selfish interests, but
> then releases it.
Isn't Redhat doing that?
I heard they were working on a complete NIST validation. That's a
stupendous effort.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-06-10 18:01:46 | Re-ordering .CONF params ... questions for this list |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-06-10 17:57:07 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-06-10 18:02:38 | Re: Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3) |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-06-10 17:57:07 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |