From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: benchmarking postgres |
Date: | 2002-02-13 07:09:01 |
Message-ID: | D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F3E6@voyager.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Why not attach a hundred users and run the same test. MySQL will be
licking *everyone's* boots. Each and every program listed would
positively slam them into the floor and grind their face in the dirt
(unless they have made some monumental improvements recently).
If a single user database is wanted, MySQL is just the ticket. When it
gets a bunch of users and has to do complex stuff, it goes into the
toilet.
As far as benchmarks go, TPC-C, TPC-H, TPC-W and TPC-R would be
interesting. Trying to beat a toy database under silly conditions is a
waste of time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 10:40 PM
To: Hackers
Subject: [HACKERS] benchmarking postgres
Look at this: (top one)
http://www.mysql.com/information/benchmarks.html
Does anyone feel like running the MySQL benchmark against postgres 7.2
to
see if there's been a real speed improvement??
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-02-13 08:09:41 | Re: alter table drop column status |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-02-13 06:40:12 | benchmarking postgres |