Re: Call perror on popen failure

> On 8 Mar 2024, at 18:08, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 08.03.24 11:05, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> If popen fails in pipe_read_line we invoke perror for the error message, and
>> pipe_read_line is in turn called by find_other_exec which is used in both
>> frontend and backend code. This is an old codepath, and it seems like it ought
>> to be replaced with the more common logging tools we now have like in the
>> attached diff (which also makes the error translated as opposed to now). Any
>> objections to removing this last perror() call?
>
> This change makes it consistent with other popen() calls, so it makes sense to me.

Thanks for review, committed that way.

--
Daniel Gustafsson