Re: Better spam filtering?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Better spam filtering?
Date: 2007-08-16 20:53:53
Message-ID: D887D710D521CB2FF71660A8@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just as an FYI ... the reason press has been getting so much spam is because
someone disabled the spam scanning on it, and virus, and ... by default, all
@postgresql.org addresses have this enabled, but at some point, it got disabled
on that specific address ...

I have re-enabled it ...

- --On Thursday, August 16, 2007 15:31:08 -0500 Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> But, as press(at)postgresql(dot)org is a mailing list, and not a mailbox, who do
>> you propose 'flagging spam through an e-mail interface'?
>
> Setup email aliases for training spam/ham. I can provide an example.
> --
> Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGxLlh4QvfyHIvDvMRAtcOAKCqC2UYcuAmT1R3uQnnlp64bIEKCQCdHHKX
nqtH+LBiphEEpT5fFrxJH0Q=
=XFKC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Selena Deckelmann 2007-08-20 19:31:56 add "donate" link to "About" navigation bar
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-16 20:31:08 Re: Better spam filtering?