From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open 7.3 items |
Date: | 2002-08-07 08:02:33 |
Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF6113801D@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 07 August 2002 02:09
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: Marc G. Fournier; Ron Snyder; Neil Conway; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items
>
>
>
> It had such limited usefulness ('password' only, only
> crypted-hashed passwords in the file) that it doesn't make
> much sense to resurect it.
>
> To directly address your point, I don't think this new
> feature will be used enough to add the capability to the user
> admin commands.
>
> I know you object, so I am going to ask for a vote.
>
> OK, here is the request for vote. Do we want:
>
> 1) the old secondary passwords re-added
> 2) the new prefixing of the database name to the
> username when enabled
> 3) do nothing
2 please. I have used secondary passwords in the past, but 2 would do
the same job and seems cleaner.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2002-08-07 10:26:39 | moving FE->BE encoding conversion |
Previous Message | selkovjr | 2002-08-07 05:41:04 | Re: HASH: Out of overflow pages. Out of luck |