| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit |
| Date: | 2002-06-14 08:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF61015393@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 14 June 2002 06:25
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] FW: Patch for current_schemas to
> optionally include implicit
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied
> patches list at:
> > http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
>
> I believe I objected to that one... we need something like it
> but Dave's first cut wasn't right.
Second cut attached. This one just adds a boolean option to the existing
function to indicate that implicit schemas are to be included (or not).
I remembered the docs as well this time :-)
BTW: Tom, I noticed that temp schemas get added to the path before
pg_catalog - I would have expected pg_catalog to always be first or have
I missed something obvious?
Regards, Dave.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| current_schemas.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2002-06-14 09:05:08 | Re: Non-standard feature request |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-14 05:27:34 | Re: guc.c and postgresql.conf.sample constistency checker |