Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL odbc list" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter
Date: 2002-06-16 09:52:45
Message-ID: D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF610150F8@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 16 June 2002 01:09
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL odbc list
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] KSQO parameter
>
> > either ... does anyone out there want to work on it?
>
> The following patch removes KSQO from GUC and the call to the
> function. It also moves the main KSQO file into _deadcode. Applied.
>
> ODBC folks, should I remove KSQO from the ODBC driver?

I'm not sure that Hiroshi has updated CVS with all our recent changes
just yet - there is certainly a patch outstanding that redesigns the
setup dialogues that I posted that would be affected by this...

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Tedder 2002-06-16 19:13:59 Re: Big Test Environment Feature
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-16 00:15:40 Caught up on email

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2002-06-17 01:57:56 Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-16 00:08:35 Re: [HACKERS] KSQO parameter