From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: More schema queries |
Date: | 2002-05-21 20:44:44 |
Message-ID: | D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF6101509C@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 21 May 2002 20:31
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More schema queries
>
> Can you
> trace it back a
> little further and try to see why it's not? It works fine
> here AFAICT, so I'm wondering about portability problems ...
This week just gets wierder. I haven't a clue what I overlooked, but
there must have been something - I put initdb back with the -- switch &
pg_catalog. prefixes. Ran it, same problem as expected.
I then added various printf's right back to DefineRelation (iirc), ran
initdb again and _could_ see the schema name in every function, and, the
views were created in pg_catalog!!
Took all the printf's back out, and it still works as expected.
Oh well :-)
Thanks for your help with this Tom, if nothing else, at least I've
learnt a fair bit.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark kirkwood | 2002-05-21 21:08:35 | Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting |
Previous Message | Bear Giles | 2002-05-21 20:27:00 | [HACKERS] 2nd cut at SSL documentation |