weird execution plan

From: "Huang, Suya" <Suya(dot)Huang(at)au(dot)experian(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: weird execution plan
Date: 2014-09-12 02:26:04
Message-ID: D83E55F5F4D99B4A9B4C4E259E6227CD01EBF04C@AUX1EXC02.apac.experian.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

Can someone figure out why the first query runs so slow comparing to the second one? They generate the same result...

dev=# explain analyze select count(distinct wid) from terms_weekly_20140503 a join port_terms b on a.term=b.terms;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=2226181.12..2226181.13 rows=1 width=516) (actual time=18757.318..18757.319 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=37.67..2095240.22 rows=52376358 width=516) (actual time=0.758..2496.190 rows=1067696 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (a.term = b.terms)
-> Seq Scan on terms_weekly_20140503 a (cost=0.00..240738.81 rows=8516481 width=548) (actual time=0.009..951.875 rows=8516481 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=22.30..22.30 rows=1230 width=32) (actual time=0.690..0.690 rows=1000 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 51kB
-> Seq Scan on port_terms b (cost=0.00..22.30 rows=1230 width=32) (actual time=0.009..0.283 rows=1000 loops=1)
Total runtime: 18757.367 ms
(8 rows)

Time: 18758.068 ms

dev=# explain analyze with x as (select distinct wid from terms_weekly_20140503 a join port_terms b on a.term=b.terms) select count(*) from x;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=2226187.62..2226187.63 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=2976.011..2976.011 rows=1 loops=1)
CTE x
-> HashAggregate (cost=2226181.12..2226183.12 rows=200 width=516) (actual time=2827.958..2896.747 rows=212249 loops=1)
-> Hash Join (cost=37.67..2095240.22 rows=52376358 width=516) (actual time=0.734..2470.533 rows=1067696 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (a.term = b.terms)
-> Seq Scan on terms_weekly_20140503 a (cost=0.00..240738.81 rows=8516481 width=548) (actual time=0.009..916.028 rows=8516481 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=22.30..22.30 rows=1230 width=32) (actual time=0.669..0.669 rows=1000 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 51kB
-> Seq Scan on port_terms b (cost=0.00..22.30 rows=1230 width=32) (actual time=0.009..0.269 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> CTE Scan on x (cost=0.00..4.00 rows=200 width=0) (actual time=2827.961..2963.878 rows=212249 loops=1)
Total runtime: 2980.681 ms
(11 rows)

Thanks,
Suya

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-09-12 02:45:05 Re: weird execution plan
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-09-11 18:09:26 Re: how to change the provoke table in hash join