Re: Escape output of pg_amcheck test

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Escape output of pg_amcheck test
Date: 2024-01-08 13:52:26
Message-ID: D8176FAC-6194-4A15-BD88-C0685FDB6CA1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jan 8, 2024, at 5:41 AM, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The /r modifier defeats the purpose of the patch, at least for my perl version, perl 5, version 28, subversion 1 (v5.28.1). With just the /aeg modifier, it works fine.

Nevermind. I might be wrong about that. I didn't have a test case handy that would generate index corruption which would result in characters of the problematic class, and so I quickly wrote some (wrong) instrumentation to try to test your patch.


Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2024-01-08 14:01:40 Re: weird GROUPING SETS and ORDER BY behaviour
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2024-01-08 13:41:02 Re: Escape output of pg_amcheck test