From: | "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE) |
Date: | 2002-05-21 17:30:27 |
Message-ID: | D6AC37B2F664D4119F2A0008C7E65D58067B6CAF@emss04m06.cpc.lmms.lmco.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Gawk --version returns :
GNU awk 3.0.2
Thanks for the help . I'll try initdb as soon as I'm done building.
Regards,
Ralph Lecessi
> ----------
> From: Tom Lane[SMTP:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: Lecessi, Ralph
> Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE)
>
> "Lecessi, Ralph" <ralph(dot)lecessi(at)lmco(dot)com> writes:
> >>Do you have another flavor of awk available to try? I still doubt that
> >>it's gawk's fault, but we need to eliminate possibilities.
>
> > I ran with nawk (/usr/bin/nawk) & the parse error went away.
>
> Interesting. What version of gawk have you got? People build all the
> time using gawk on Linux, and no one's ever reported such a failure that
> I can recall. (FWIW, "gawk --version" reports 3.1.0 on my Linux box,
> and I also build successfully with gawk 3.0.4 on my HPUX box.)
>
> > Is their any way I can check if the awk output is valid (is their
> > anything I can check for or compare with) ?
>
> If you can initdb and run the regression tests successfully, then you
> can be quite certain genbki worked.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-21 18:54:05 | Re: Bug #668: cursors with params: mismatched parentheses; |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-21 16:57:01 | Re: Bug #669: gawk: cmd. line:2: (END OF FILE) |