Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: An attempt to avoid locally-committed-but-not-replicated-to-standby-transactions in synchronous replication
Date: 2023-08-02 19:47:51
Message-ID: D52A9851-E4C5-40CD-98E5-F6BC0417ED0F@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 30 Jan 2023, at 06:55, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I started to spend time on this feature again. Thanks all for your
> comments so far.

Since there hasn't been any updates for the past six months, and the patch
hasn't applied for a few months, I am marking this returned with feedback for
now. Please feel free to open a new entry in a future CF for this patch when
there is a new version.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-08-02 19:52:24 Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-08-02 18:58:11 Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes