| From: | ries van Twisk <pg(at)rvt(dot)dds(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Angel Alvarez <clist(at)uah(dot)es>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Annoying Reply-To |
| Date: | 2008-10-23 20:52:30 |
| Message-ID: | D4826D49-AB5A-439B-8E55-57C7D4E62478@rvt.dds.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Oct 23, 2008, at 3:44 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Angel Alvarez wrote:
>
>>>>> horse. Since I use the most advanced e-mail client on the
>>>>> market I just
>>>>> work around that the settings here are weird
>>
>> What's such most advanced mail reader??
>
> That quoted bit was actually from me, I was hoping to get a laugh
> out of anyone who actually looked at the header of my messages to
> see what I use. Or perhaps start a flamewar with those deviant mutt
> users; that would be about as productive as the continued existence
> of this thread.
Just checked... it says : Sender: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Does that mean a reply should go back to the sender???? :D Just
kidding....
anyways.. I don't care anymore... I will do a reply all.
regards, Ries van Twisk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Coventry | 2008-10-23 20:54:41 | Re: Annoying Reply-To |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-23 20:51:56 | Re: Annoying Reply-To |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Coventry | 2008-10-23 20:54:41 | Re: Annoying Reply-To |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-23 20:51:56 | Re: Annoying Reply-To |