Re: WIN32 Build?

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Shoaib Mir" <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "DEV" <dev(at)umpa-us(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIN32 Build?
Date: 2006-08-09 23:12:25
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757DB2A@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 2:19 PM
> To: Shoaib Mir
> Cc: DEV; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] WIN32 Build?
>
> Shoaib Mir wrote:
> > Dev,
> >
> > You are doing it a little wrong for Debug version, in order to build
the
> > Debug version use the following:
> >
> > nmake /f win32.mak DEBUG=1
> >
> > Bruce,
> >
> > If you remove "inline" the build process goes fine and if you dont,
it
> first
> > gives a few warning and in the end quits the build process with a
fatal
> > error.
>
> OK, good to know. If we ever find a symbol that is defined for that
> compiler that we can test, we can fix this.

#ifdef _MSC_VER
#define inline __inline
#endif

An alternative would be to do this:

#ifdef _MSC_VER
#define inline
#endif

And let the compiler inline with /Ob2 (which generally makes better
decisions than the programmer anyway).

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-09 23:57:04 Re: PITR timeline question
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-09 22:44:17 Re: Not so much load balancing as load limits