Re: Oracle buys Innobase

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "snacktime" <snacktime(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-10 18:29:24
Message-ID: D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F8944154757D19C@postal.corporate.connx.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Consider what happened to Stak verse MS.
Stak won the court case but still went out of business.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fetter [mailto:david(at)fetter(dot)org]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 11:17 AM
> To: Marc G. Fournier
> Cc: Dann Corbit; snacktime; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:47:31PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Stupid question here, but how susceptible is Oracle to "monopolistic
> > practices", similar to what M$ is going through with the DoJ in the
> > US? This seems to be *very* close to the line, if it isn't over it
> > ... no?
>
> It may well be, but somebody would have sue, and then they would have
> to win against Oracle. I don't think that MySQL AB has the resources
> to fight such a legal action, even assuming they'd win it.
>
> Cheers,
> D
> --
> David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
>
> Remember to vote!

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-10-10 18:39:24 Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-10 18:18:21 Re: Oracle buys Innobase