From: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Harpreet Dhaliwal" <harpreet(dot)dhaliwal01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Postgres General" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum DB in Postgres Vs similar concept in other RDBMS |
Date: | 2007-05-23 21:19:37 |
Message-ID: | D425483C2C5C9F49B5B7A41F894415470100069C@postal.corporate.connx.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In SQL*Server it is called "UPDATE STATISTICS"
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187348.aspx
Oracle tuning is a lot more fiddly:
http://searchoracle.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid41_gci121
3646,00.html
________________________________
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Harpreet
Dhaliwal
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 10:49 AM
To: Postgres General
Subject: [GENERAL] Vacuum DB in Postgres Vs similar concept in other
RDBMS
Hi,
I was wondering if Vacuum DB concept in Postgres is really novel and
there's no concept like this in other RDBMS like oracle or sql server.
If at all other RDBMS have such a concept implemented, how good or bad
it is as compared to postgres's vacuum db concept.
Any type of pointers would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
~Harpreet
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Staubo | 2007-05-23 21:27:24 | Re: Vacuum DB in Postgres Vs similar concept in other RDBMS |
Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-05-23 21:17:31 | Re: the future of pljava development |