Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Løcke <thomas(dot)granvej6(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Date: 2010-05-01 23:30:10
Message-ID: D3DAA757-CEA4-4550-8DC5-8384944A3C0C@killerbytes.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On May 1, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Greg Smith wrote:

> SQL Server uses MVCC too as of their 2005 release, implemented with row versioning similarly to Postgres. The main non-MVCC holdout at this point is DB2.

Funny, I've ported to even later versions than that, but missed the change. Well, OK, I'm sure I read it in the release notes at the time, but it made no important different to the app I was working on at the time.

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message justin@magwerks.com 2010-05-02 00:24:16 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-05-01 23:16:57 Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server