From: | "Eric Ridge" <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SETOF and language 'plpgsql' |
Date: | 2001-11-03 23:51:21 |
Message-ID: | D3ADE25911614840BC69C72E3171E4ED0FBDDD@tcdiexch.tcdi.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I think you misread that ;-). What I was saying was that there wasn't
> (any longer) anything outside plpgsql that would prevent it from
> returning sets. There would be a nontrivial amount of work to do
inside
> plpgsql to make it happen; see Jan's followup
Thanks for the clarification. :)
> > It's over a year later. What's the status today?
>
> About the same.
>
> There is support in 7.2 for plpgsql functions to return references to
> cursors. This is not by any means the same thing as a SETOF result,
> but it can serve some of the same purposes.
I'll look into this to see if it can do what I want. Or if I can do
what it wants!
eric
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mike Mascari | 2001-11-04 00:25:44 | Re: Off-Topic: Accounting question |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-03 22:44:07 | Re: CREATE TYPE delimiter? |