Re: Regression in query optimizer when upgrading from 9.4.5 to 9.5.2?

From: "Erdmann, Markus (at) Bellevue" <Markus(dot)Erdmann(at)cbre(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression in query optimizer when upgrading from 9.4.5 to 9.5.2?
Date: 2016-06-17 21:05:24
Message-ID: D389B3F4.FB%markus.erdmann@cbre.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Thank you Tom and David for your very helpful replies. We dumped and
restored the RDS staging database on a local installation of pg and were
not able to reproduce the issue in 9.5.2, which led us to try running a
VACUUM ANALYZE and recreating indexes. After this we no longer saw a
discrepancy between the query plan in the separate environments. Is this
what you meant, Tom, by making sure to ANALYZE? Or did you mean including
ANALYZE in EXPLAIN ANALYZE?

On 6/17/16, 11:17 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

>"Erdmann, Markus @ Bellevue" <Markus(dot)Erdmann(at)cbre(dot)com> writes:
>> We¹re trying to debug a performance issue affecting our staging
>>database, and we¹ve narrowed it down to a difference in the query
>>optimizer in 9.5.2. Upgrading to 9.5 is important for us because we need
>>the ability to import foreign schemas.
>
>I think the core of the problem is the large rowcount estimation error
>here:
>
>> -> Bitmap Index Scan on
>>transactions_transaction_c69e55a4 (cost=0.00..18.02 rows=161 width=0)
>>(actual time=20.153..20.153 rows=269021 loops=1)
>> Index Cond: ((date_created >=
>>'2010-01-01'::date) AND (date_created <= '2015-12-31'::date))
>
>That's a pretty simple condition and it's hard to believe that 9.5 does it
>much differently than 9.4 did. Perhaps you forgot to ANALYZE, or were
>using a larger statistics target in the 9.4 installation?
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John W Higgins 2016-06-17 21:33:11 Re: OT hardware recommend
Previous Message Andy Colson 2016-06-17 20:36:57 OT hardware recommend