| From: | Andrew McNamara <andrewm(at)object-craft(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Andrew McNamara <andrewm(at)object-craft(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: No sanity checking performed on binary TIME parameters. |
| Date: | 2009-05-26 00:41:14 |
| Message-ID: | D3700A6F-9A11-44A7-97AE-EC8C64E20824@object-craft.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26/05/2009, at 10:25 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew McNamara <andrewm(at)object-craft(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Are there any other cases where the binary receive functions are
>> missing sanity checks?
>
> Possibly --- you want to go looking?
Uh. I'd be lying if I said I "wanted to" - I got enough of a taste of
those functions when trying to work out what they expect when doing my
ocpgdb module. At the moment, however, I have a good excuse for
wimping out - every waking hour is being expended on swine flu related
work (although I'd almost welcome the distraction of a good *virtual*
bug hunt).
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2009-05-26 00:46:42 | Re: usability of pg_get_function_arguments |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-26 00:25:36 | Re: No sanity checking performed on binary TIME parameters. |