From: | Dmytrii Nagirniak <dnagir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimise PostgreSQL for fast testing |
Date: | 2012-02-24 00:16:33 |
Message-ID: | D1922B3B-4565-4B90-913C-AE8876862D7A@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 24/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Would appreciate some suggestions.
>
> You really need to explain why this matters...
I've just replied to Adrian with more details. I suppose you don't mind to take a look there so I won't copy-paste it :)
> You mention a "typical Ruby on Rails app" and then discuss SQLite.
> Well, typical web apps have more than 1 user, so fairly obviously
> using SQLite isn't appropriate.
This is rally irrelevant to this thread, but I believe you are not right here: http://www.sqlite.org/whentouse.html
Websites
SQLite usually will work great as the database engine for low to medium traffic websites (which is to say, 99.9% of all websites).
> If SQLite isn't appropriate, why are
> you testing with it?
It is appropriate in the first place. But another reason to use SQLite for testing is that is fast and easy to maintain and setup.
Since I need to use PG FTS (and that's the only reason), I have to use PG for testing too.
And this is where this thread comes in.
> Perhaps just run half the test, that would make it twice as quick and
> still just as valid.
>
> If Postgres tests run in ~1 minute, what benefit have you gained from
> saving 30 seconds? How often are you running tests?
I think it is irrelevant to the this thread, but here's my math:
I run full suite aprox every 5 mins. Which is ~ 100 times a day.
Now, 30s*100 = 50mins vs 60s=100mins.
This is another ~hour lost a day.
On top of that I would run a single test file probably every couple of minutes or so.
(So even if it is a couple of seconds slower, it all adds up a lot).
This is just a common TDD style. Watch the https://www.destroyallsoftware.com/ for example to see what I mean.
Don't get me wrong, I realise that PG and SQLite are totally different beasts.
That's totally fine if PG can't beat SQLite on speed in **this particular case**.
I just want to try to tune it to be as fast as it can (for **this particular case**, see my reply to Adrian).
Cheers.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmytrii Nagirniak | 2012-02-24 00:22:57 | Re: Optimise PostgreSQL for fast testing |
Previous Message | Harvey, Allan AC | 2012-02-24 00:00:46 | Re: psql latex and newlines |