From: | Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Kovacs" <maxottovonstirlitz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? |
Date: | 2007-02-27 15:57:15 |
Message-ID: | D1445F47-9CD4-4240-B0ED-A75ABE4B6867@silentmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Just remember that batteries (in both RAID cards and UPSes) wear out
and will eventually have to be replaced. It depends how critical your
data is, but if you only have a UPS, you risk badness in the off
chance that your power fails and you haven't replaced your UPS battery.
On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:27 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I wonder if running a machine on a UPS + 1 hot standby internal PS is
> equivalent, in terms of data integrity, to using battery backed write
> cache. Instinctively, I'd think that UPS + 1 hot standby internal PS
> is better, since this setup also provides for the disk to actually
> write out the content of the cache -- as you pointed out.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2007-02-27 16:05:39 | Re: Opinions on Raid |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-02-27 13:56:08 | Re: Opinions on Raid |