From: | "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sean R Melody <srm765(at)merle(dot)acns(dot)nwu(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: [GENERAL] 8 K Limit?? |
Date: | 1999-06-07 22:40:03 |
Message-ID: | D05EF808F2DFD211AE4A00105AA1B5D21F2538@cpsmail |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The limit can be increased to 32K if you're willing to recompile, but I
doubt this will completely solve your problem.
There is also the Large Objects interface which has a whole set of problems
all it's own.
If setting the limit to 32K will solve your problem you might ask in
pgsql-admin what to change.
If using Large Objects is the way you decide to go try pgsql-interfaces.
But chances are you can code around the limitation. (Hey I've used
commercial databases with a 2K limit's so PostgreSQL's 8K limit has spoiled
me.)
-DEJ
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean R Melody [SMTP:srm765(at)merle(dot)acns(dot)nwu(dot)edu]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 4:41 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] 8 K Limit??
>
> Our student government here at Northwestern is putting our legislation
> archives online with Postgresql. The only problem we encountered was
> that there seems to be an 8 K table limit in Postgresql. I was
> wondering if there is a way around it or if version 6.5 will no longer
> have this limitation.
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Charles Hornberger | 1999-06-07 23:29:45 | Re: [GENERAL] Parser error |
Previous Message | Sean R Melody | 1999-06-07 21:40:48 | 8 K Limit?? |