RE: [GENERAL] 8 K Limit??

From: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
To: Sean R Melody <srm765(at)merle(dot)acns(dot)nwu(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] 8 K Limit??
Date: 1999-06-07 22:40:03
Message-ID: D05EF808F2DFD211AE4A00105AA1B5D21F2538@cpsmail
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The limit can be increased to 32K if you're willing to recompile, but I
doubt this will completely solve your problem.
There is also the Large Objects interface which has a whole set of problems
all it's own.
If setting the limit to 32K will solve your problem you might ask in
pgsql-admin what to change.
If using Large Objects is the way you decide to go try pgsql-interfaces.
But chances are you can code around the limitation. (Hey I've used
commercial databases with a 2K limit's so PostgreSQL's 8K limit has spoiled
me.)
-DEJ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean R Melody [SMTP:srm765(at)merle(dot)acns(dot)nwu(dot)edu]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 4:41 PM
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] 8 K Limit??
>
> Our student government here at Northwestern is putting our legislation
> archives online with Postgresql. The only problem we encountered was
> that there seems to be an 8 K table limit in Postgresql. I was
> wondering if there is a way around it or if version 6.5 will no longer
> have this limitation.
> Thanks,
> Sean
>
>

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Hornberger 1999-06-07 23:29:45 Re: [GENERAL] Parser error
Previous Message Sean R Melody 1999-06-07 21:40:48 8 K Limit??