Re: Small improvement to parallel query docs

From: Brad DeJong <Brad(dot)Dejong(at)infor(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small improvement to parallel query docs
Date: 2017-02-13 21:56:36
Message-ID: CY1PR0201MB18979AD8D6607EE51FA2F1D5FF590@CY1PR0201MB1897.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley wrote:
> I propose we just remove the whole paragraph, and mention about
> the planning and estimated number of groups stuff in another new paragraph.
>
> I've attached a patch to this effect ...

s/In a worse case scenario/In the worst case scenario,/

Other than that, the phrasing in the new patch reads very smoothly.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-02-13 22:00:25 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove all references to "xlog" from SQL-callable functions in p
Previous Message David Rowley 2017-02-13 21:43:56 Re: Small improvement to parallel query docs