Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?

From: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Thomas Munro" <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Justin Pryzby" <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Date: 2023-08-08 15:25:52
Message-ID: CUN9O1FGBHA1.3R7SSO36UFF8K@gonk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 9:15 PM CDT, Andres Freund wrote:
> FWIW: with the patches applied, the "credit costs" in cirrus CI are roughly
> like the following (depends on caching etc):
>
> task costs in credits
> linux-sanity: 0.01
> linux-compiler-warnings: 0.05
> linux-meson: 0.07
> freebsd : 0.08
> linux-autoconf: 0.09
> windows : 0.18
> macos : 0.28
> total task runtime is 40.8
> cost in credits is 0.76, monthly credits of 50 allow approx 66.10 runs/month

I am not in the loop on the autotools vs meson stuff. How much longer do
we anticipate keeping autotools around? Seems like it could be a good
opportunity to reduce some CI usage if autotools were finally dropped,
but I know there are still outstanding tasks to complete.

Back of the napkin math says autotools is about 12% of the credit cost,
though I haven't looked to see if linux-meson and linux-autotools are
1:1.

--
Tristan Partin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-08-08 15:38:17 Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc?
Previous Message Tristan Partin 2023-08-08 15:14:57 Re: Fix last unitialized memory warning