| From: | "Nicholson, Brad (Toronto, ON, CA)" <bnicholson(at)hpe(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |
| Date: | 2016-09-01 16:09:40 |
| Message-ID: | CS1PR84MB021400192648A5511E837C76D7E20@CS1PR84MB0214.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-advocacy-
> owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> So, I have to say, this doesn't *feel* like a major press-worthy feature yet. It
> will be in 10, but is it right now?
For me the press-worthy side of this in its current state is that it allows for a no-data loss guarantee in the event of a network partition.
Having more than two sync copies of data is pretty major in my opinion as well.
Brad.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-01 23:56:09 | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-09-01 06:06:10 | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |