RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2024-12-26 14:23:10
Message-ID: CP4P284MB1968F2CDF45E4EB593BD5940EC0D2@CP4P284MB1968.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Hi,
>
>I provided a patch a month ago with a new approach as suggested by David. Unfortunately, it didn't get any attention in the November CF.
>
>I would appreciate your feedback on whether we should proceed with this new approach or stick with the previous one.
>
>Regards,
>Hunaid Sohail
--//--
Hi,
The previous version was good to go and ready for a commit as soon as the final review is finalized. About David’s proposal, I’m still a little unsure, but it seems like it has a lot of potential. What do you all think? If it’s a strong direction to explore, maybe David could join us as a co-author and work with us to bring the feature.
Regards,
Maiquel.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benoit Lobréau 2024-12-26 14:25:46 Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Previous Message Michail Nikolaev 2024-12-26 13:56:50 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation