| From: | Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time |
| Date: | 2024-11-06 19:28:33 |
| Message-ID: | CP4P284MB1968DD763492114BCFD1657BEC532@CP4P284MB1968.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>This function has this name since 600da67fbe5e back from 2008.
>Changing that 16 years later will break things.
Certainly, there are more considerations to take into account
than I initially realized. One possibility would be to create an
alias (or synonym) for the function "pg_postmaster_start_time",
naming it "pg_postgres_start_time". This way, the name change
could occur gradually and strategically over the coming years,
without immediate impact. I believe this approach could be
viable to facilitate a future transition without abrupt breaks.
Maiquel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-11-06 19:50:41 | Re: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2024-11-06 19:22:10 | Re: Commit Timestamp and LSN Inversion issue |