RE: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time

From: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time
Date: 2024-11-06 21:06:57
Message-ID: CP4P284MB196877117FDA7EB67D442C29EC532@CP4P284MB1968.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>Except it doesn't seem like users are confused. It is just someone in the ivory tower thinking they could be. It feels like make-work for a problem that doesn't actually exist.

Hello. I understand that this type of comment could be interpreted as
discouraging and detrimental to the development of new ideas and
the growth of the community as a whole. I recognize that your
perspective has great value in helping to identify potential situations
that may not be viable. However, I would like to suggest that the way
these issues are expressed publicly could be more careful to avoid
misunderstandings.

Maiquel.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-11-06 21:21:21 Re: FW: Building Postgres 17.0 with meson
Previous Message Maiquel Grassi 2024-11-06 21:02:14 RE: Rename Function: pg_postmaster_start_time