Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

From: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Hunaid Sohail <hunaidpgml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih(at)amazon(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+
Date: 2025-02-21 19:08:44
Message-ID: CP4P284MB19684B170519CADEC9086886ECC72@CP4P284MB1968.BRAP284.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>You don't get "There were only 99 Luftballons" or any such nonsense, and I
>don't see why \conninfo gets to play different rules. So I got rid of
>\conninfo+.

From my perspective across this, I support this approach.

Regards,
Maiquel.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-02-21 19:31:33 Re: AIO v2.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-02-21 18:49:42 Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+