Re: Advise on memory usage limitation by PostgreSQL on Windows

From: Daniel Begin <jfd553(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: "'Venkata Balaji N'" <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'pgsql-general'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Advise on memory usage limitation by PostgreSQL on Windows
Date: 2015-09-23 11:37:22
Message-ID: COL129-DS2638B01BFA2CEACD0BFC794440@phx.gbl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Venkata ,

Not really an advice but the wiki has specific comments about shared_buffers values in Windows environment. See…

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-resource.html#GUC-SHARED-BUFFERS

I use a Windows 7 64b, 16 GB RAM, 4 cores. According to the above link I set shared_buffers = 128MB with an effective_cache_size = 12GB

Daniel

From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Venkata Balaji N
Sent: September-22-15 21:33
To: pgsql-general
Subject: [GENERAL] Advise on memory usage limitation by PostgreSQL on Windows

Hello,

We would like to know if there is any limitation around memory utilization by PostgreSQL on Windows systems.

As of now, we do not have the details about the exact Windows version in use.

Windows server is with 5 GB RAM and 4 CPUs (4 cores). PostgreSQL Version is 9.1.x which will possibly be upgraded to 9.4.x.

After a detailed analysis on memory usage by OS and other processes, is it safe to advise on configuring shared_buffers to 2 GB ?

Any advise will be appreciated.

Regards,

Venkata Balaji N

Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etienne Champetier 2015-09-23 13:38:45 OR vs UNION vs UNION ALL
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-23 02:44:38 Re: The curious case of two inserts, a shrinking xmax, and a ShareLock on transaction