From: | jcllario at hotmail(dot)com (JOSE CARLOS MARTINEZ LLARIO) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Pljava built |
Date: | 2011-01-20 13:36:43 |
Message-ID: | COL116-W62496D158314AA895301D3D3F90@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
Hi Johann,thanks for your fast answer and interest.
The binaries for windows are really interesting too because many people are using postgres for windows as well.
This is my pole:Postgres 9 and Postgres 8.4 (maybe postgres 8.3 is not very interesting?)32 and 64 bits versionsWindows and Linux (dont know about mac as im not a mac user)
sorry there are many combinations (8 different builds?)and it means a lot of work but it is necessary to make people use pljava widely.Best,
PD: If there are many different builds and this is too much work for you, I would suggest to get rid of postgres 8.4 versions too as many linux distro and windows new intallation are not going to use it in next months. I think that Windows/Linux and 32/64 bits versions are necessary though.Jose
Hi Jose,On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 5:37 AM, JOSE CARLOS MARTINEZ LLARIO> I dont thing pljava is an experimental project but mature one so to> distribute the binaries to the people who is using it would be a high> priority. If not the result could be some people are getting rid of pljava> or forcing to build it in not a 'good condition'.You're right. ?I'll add binaries for Linux at least as a priority.Hopefully I can also build Windows binaries soon. ?I'm also interestedin knowing what other platforms are also widely used.Johann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20110120/97a28364/attachment.html>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | JOSE CARLOS MARTINEZ LLARIO | 2011-01-20 13:37:22 | [Pljava-dev] Pljava built |
Previous Message | Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson | 2011-01-20 06:14:00 | [Pljava-dev] Pljava builts |