From: | Dem Fra Hedehusene i Danmark <post_overalt(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql novice PostgreSQL forum support <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PIT Recovery of only certain database in the "cluster" ? |
Date: | 2011-03-11 15:31:33 |
Message-ID: | COL109-W49D6450869DF8321FB4372FFCB0@phx.gbl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Thanks Tom,
Pardon me this one additional Q since I'm used to SQLsrv/Oracle where this single db point in time restore would be quite easily done :
Is the thought behind this, that databases in a cluster will always be "dependent" on each other and therefore likely to require a recovery of all cluster databases to the same point in time, if requested by one of the "application database owners" ?
So, one is forced to create "single database cluster" if we want to offer single database recovery, isolated from other running databases ?
/Brian
> CC: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [NOVICE] PIT Recovery of only certain database in the "cluster" ?
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:29:15 -0500
> From: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
>
>
> > We would like to have, say a database for each application , in our cluster/instance.
> > And use continuous archiving to be able to maximize our chance of not loosing any data... And do Point In Tiem recovery of any of the databases.
>
> Doesn't work that way: PITR operates across a whole cluster.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas, Sean | 2011-03-11 20:26:32 | Installing postgressql for use with Redmine |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-11 14:29:15 | Re: PIT Recovery of only certain database in the "cluster" ? |