From: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: capacity of datatype "text" |
Date: | 2004-10-19 18:15:09 |
Message-ID: | CFD4D432-21FA-11D9-8DDE-000A95B03262@pgedit.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Oct 19, 2004, at 1:14 AM, David Garamond wrote:
> btw, TEXT is one of those postgres-specific features that makes you
> stick (stuck? :-) with postgres. nowadays, i never ever have to bother
> to think whether to give a column a max width of 32, 50, 64, 100, 150,
> ... is that a bad thing
I don't think it is a bad thing. Unless there is a clear and specific
limit related to the domain, why create one? You can create a last name
field with 20, 30, or 50 characters but there are no rules in the world
that will ensure you picked the right limit.
I guess it is only a bad thing if you have to consider porting your
PostgreSQL database. Hopefully it won't ever happen :).
Best,
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph.Dunleavy | 2004-10-19 18:18:44 | Re: download postgreql problem |
Previous Message | Josh Close | 2004-10-19 18:00:30 | removing idle connections |