Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm going to work on totally re-doing that site ...

- --On Wednesday, August 29, 2007 07:41:14 +0200 Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

>> > Yeah. And you think the presence of PostgreSQL Inc isn't a problem
>> > today? No offense to Marc, both he and PostgreSQL Inc has done a lot of
>> > good things, but it certainly does *not* help the community to have a
>> > company named the same way as our OSS product that claims 7.4 has just
>> > been released and nothing has happened with us since 7.4.
>>
>> There is actually a *huge* difference here ... joshua will/would be actively
>> pushing/marketing "Postgres, Inc" ... PostgreSQL, Inc hasn't done either for
>> over 2 years now ... I've even started to scale back the web site itself ...
>
> Yes. while we don't *know* that will happen this has the potential of being
> worse, at least.
>
> On the website issue, I've been meaning to ask you: since your news page
> isn't actually updated anymore, would you consider removing it or at least
> add info to it saying it's not updated? there are probably other parts out
> of date too, but that's the worst one I think.
>
> /Magnus
>

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFG1Qsh4QvfyHIvDvMRAvJKAJ9jBRcAihOVhO9hBZkn+XZrCariUACffIk+
AjXZWJF3ANi5MnNgnw93R5M=
=zp1I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----