Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output
Date: 2010-08-05 22:05:24
Message-ID: CF8033D9-741C-438A-9D96-D41F1C47B491@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Aug4, 2010, at 13:58 , Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Aug3, 2010, at 21:16 , Greg Smith wrote:
>>> That was a leftover of the trimming and comment skipping logic, which my patch moves to process_command.
>>
>> I think there's still a trimming error here--line 195 of the new patch is now removing the declaration of "i" just before it sets it to zero?
> Hm, I think it's just the diff thats miss-leading there. It correctly marks the "int i" line as "removed" with a "-", but for some reason marks the "i = 0" line (and its successors) with a "!", although they're removed too, and not modified.
>
>> On the coding standard side, I noticed all your for loops are missing a space between the for and the (; that should get fixed.
> Fixed

Crap. I've messed up to the effect that the for-loop formatting fix wasn't actually in the patch.

Attached is an updated version (v4).

Sorry for the noise.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

Attachment Content-Type Size
pgbench_statementlatency_v4.patch application/octet-stream 13.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-05 22:13:29 Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-08-05 21:31:49 Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown