Re: Should core decide the name?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Peterson <ron(dot)peterson(at)yellowbank(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should core decide the name?
Date: 2007-08-31 01:54:26
Message-ID: CE3565A69C1A59A2E60DD7A9@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- --On Thursday, August 30, 2007 21:50:26 -0400 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
wrote:

> Only "Postgres" requires domain names, "PostgresQL" does not. Of course
> core could make any changes, but cvs committers could make the change
> too.

And core *could* very quickly reverse those changes and remove comit access :)

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFG13TS4QvfyHIvDvMRAooQAJ97qIIPQ9+PW4wbLSXuSDZRmH5u0gCglFUp
4MrLwwqgoaDoVwdnRMALQnw=
=O0no
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-08-31 07:53:06 Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-31 01:50:26 Re: Should core decide the name?