Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

From: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Eric B(dot) Ridge <ebr(at)tcdi(dot)com>
Cc: David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-01-22 01:38:33
Message-ID: CE1601B0-29B9-4CFE-BEBC-5EA81A2BC7FC@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

On Jan 21, 2010, at 4:02 PM, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2010, at 12:35 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>
>> And where do you think baby powder comes from? Sheesh.
>
> You won the thread!

Heh, who's the wise guy that posted the second comment on http://www.betanews.com/article/EU-clears-Oracle-Sun-If-MySQL-fails-theres-always-PostgreSQL/1264109388 ?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pgAdmin Trac 2010-01-22 06:25:11 Re: [pgAdmin III] #117: Explain Buffers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-22 00:22:09 Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-22 02:31:11 Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-01-22 01:19:26 Re: Partitioning syntax