From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
Subject: | Re: Where to Host Project |
Date: | 2008-09-20 19:44:37 |
Message-ID: | CDF531ED-6E14-4F9C-B236-F6182D854B0B@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le 20 sept. 08 à 09:42, Dave Page a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake
> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
>>> developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
>>> waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after some
>>> initial problems. I suspect JD will tell me something different
>>> though
>>> - that being the case, perhaps we can work out the issues and get on
>>> with the upgrade.
I suppose the plan is to upgrade to a newer GForge. Is it still time
to propose something completely different? I have real good feedbacks
about VHFFS, a perl based clean-room re-implementation of it, if you
want to see it this way.
http://www.vhffs.org/wiki/index.php
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/VHFFS (easy to grasp keywords)
Hope this helps, regards,
- --
dim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjVUqcACgkQlBXRlnbh1bnuWwCgsWMSrYACh2lOt+xbeqa6DCbO
j7AAnifgloNY7ldaA+54S9HLlLxqBvuC
=LoLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-09-20 19:57:09 | Re: PostgreSQL future ideas |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-09-20 18:48:33 | Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now? |