Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables

From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables
Date: 2025-04-15 16:35:48
Message-ID: CDECDCD3-4A23-4FE6-A815-E23AFEC1D008@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 April 2025 18:18:41 CEST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I only got the "ERROR: deadlock detected" message once, with pg_restore
>> compiled from master branch.
>
>Oh, hmm ... do you recall just when on the master branch? I'm
>wondering if it was before or after 14e87ffa5 (2024-11-08).
>If it was after, then it might have been subject to the same
>issue with not-null constraints that I ran into.
>
> regards, tom lane

Definitely after.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-04-15 16:42:00 Re: [Proposal] Add \dAt [AMPTRN [TBLPTRN]] to list tables by Table Access Method in psql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-04-15 16:24:57 Re: Add estimated hit ratio to Memoize in EXPLAIN to explain cost adjustment