| From: | Jeff Frost <jeff(at)pgexperts(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? |
| Date: | 2016-07-12 15:32:43 |
| Message-ID: | CDE4DAF6-D8FB-4CC0-996A-299D4DD34987@pgexperts.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
> On Jul 12, 2016, at 8:31 AM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, 2016-07-12 at 08:14 -0700, Jeff Frost wrote:
>> If the chart is to be believed, the only issue is:
>>
>> ipv6+CNAME buggy in <=1.10
>>
>> Do you know which versions are standard in the supported distros these days?
>
> RHEL 5: 1.6.0
> RHEL 6, RHEL 7, Fedora 22, Fedora 23: 1.10.0
> Fedora 24, rawhide: 1.11.0
>
> Quick note: Even though CNAME+IPv6 is buggy, that feature even does not exist
> in libevent (at least this is what I understand from the chart ("ipv4 only")),
> so we are not introducing new bugs here.
Sounds like at least nobody could be using ipv6 with cnames on the current setup, so I agree, it seems fine.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2016-07-12 16:04:30 | Repmgr update (and tickets) |
| Previous Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2016-07-12 15:31:10 | Re: Switching to c-ares for pgbouncer? |