From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: new contrib module plpgsql's embeded sql validator |
Date: | 2011-07-21 22:00:50 |
Message-ID: | CD8B5F74-2D12-4B23-A5A7-F61808AF78C0@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:51 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> If you mean that such checks would be done automatically, no, they
>> shouldn't be. Consider a function that creates a table and then uses
>> it, or even just depends on using a table that doesn't yet exist when
>> you do CREATE FUNCTION.
>
> yes, any deep check is not possible for function that uses a temporary tables.
>
> A plpgsql_lint is not silver bullet - for these cases is necessary to
> disable lint.
>
> . I can't to speak generally - I have no idea, how much percent of
> functions are functions with access to temporary tables - in my last
> project I use 0 temp tables on cca 300 KB of plpgsql code.
>
> The more terrible problem is a new dependency between functions. I use
> a workaround - some like headers
You can work around temp table issues the same way: just define the temp table before you create the function.
In practice, if I have a function that depends on a temp table it either creates it itself if it doesn't already exist or I have a separate function to create the table; that way you have a single place that has the temp table definition, and that is in the database itself.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-21 22:17:28 | Re: sinval synchronization considered harmful |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-21 21:52:57 | Re: storing TZ along timestamps |