From: | juanmarianofuentes <juanmarianofuentes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: JDBC array support |
Date: | 2017-11-08 18:39:32 |
Message-ID: | CD417756-CCBF-43DC-9ACD-D9F6122EB6FD@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Thanks Jorge,
Hope it makes it to the official release soon.
Juan
> On Nov 8, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> There is a PR pending of review: https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/887 <https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/887>
>
> Jorge Solórzano
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 12:17 PM, juanmarianofuentes <juanmarianofuentes(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:juanmarianofuentes(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I’m new to this list, I hope to get some support regarding the JDBC driver since I’m developing a middleware using Postgresql.
>
> I have successfully use the driver to set Object arrays.
> preparedStatement.setArray(parameterIndex, connection.createArrayOf(sqlType, (Object[]) parameter));
>
> The issue here, is that I see myself forced to create object arrays when I could perfectly manage this use case using arrays of basic types, been that way more memory efficient.
>
> I hope somebody with more experience can point me on the right direction.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Juan
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org <mailto:pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc <http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jorge Solorzano | 2017-11-10 21:25:31 | [pgjdbc/pgjdbc] f57428: test: querymode extendedCacheEverything (#1007) |
Previous Message | Jorge Solórzano | 2017-11-08 18:27:03 | Re: JDBC array support |