Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL

From: Pietro Pugni <pietro(dot)pugni(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Krupka <jkrupka(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL
Date: 2015-04-03 15:33:20
Message-ID: CC75431A-0CCC-48FF-BB2D-9694272AD7B4@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi Josh,
at the moment the server is unreachable so I can’t calculate sizes. I run all of my test both with all data loaded into Postgres and with no data loaded (except from the single 20mln rows table with relative indexes).
To give you an idea, with all data loaded into Postgres with indexes the space occupied is approximately 1.2-1.5TB and free space on is about 800GB.

Many thanks.
Best regads,
Pietro

Il giorno 03/apr/2015, alle ore 17:21, Josh Krupka <jkrupka(at)gmail(dot)com> ha scritto:

> Sorry, how much disk space is actually used by the tables, indexes, etc involved in your queries? Or it that's a bit much to get, how much disk space is occupied by your database in total?

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mel Llaguno 2015-04-03 17:44:30 Re: Some performance testing?
Previous Message Josh Krupka 2015-04-03 15:21:26 Re: Can't get Dell PE T420 (Perc H710) perform better than a MacMini with PostgreSQL