From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clustering Database Servers |
Date: | 2005-05-09 19:29:43 |
Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966C9E@vamail01.thexchange.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Slony is the master-slave (not multi-master IIRC) replication environment.
I haven't used it, but apparently there are cognoscenti among us who have.
I would think, a bit, about what kind of "load" (e.g. CPU, network, disk
queues, disk allocation, et cetera) you want to balance before picking up
the hammer .... (sorry to preach...)
hth,
Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Craig Bryden
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:42 PM
To: pgsql
Subject: [GENERAL] Clustering Database Servers
Hi
In MS SQL there is a concept of Clustering database servers. This allows for load balancing. Does PostgreSQL have a similar concept?
Thanks
Craig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-09 19:38:47 | Re: Trigger that spawns forked process |
Previous Message | Christopher Murtagh | 2005-05-09 19:25:20 | Trigger that spawns forked process |