From: | "Mohan, Ross" <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Date: | 2005-04-20 16:44:01 |
Message-ID: | CC74E7E10A8A054798B6611BD1FEF4D307966B99@vamail01.thexchange.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
right, the oracle system uses a second "low latency" bus to
manage locking information (at the block level) via a
distributed lock manager. (but this is slightly different
albeit related to a clustered file system and OS-managed
locking, eg)
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Dawid Kuroczko
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 4:56 AM
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] How to improve db performance with $7K?
On 4/19/05, Mohan, Ross <RMohan(at)arbinet(dot)com> wrote:
> Clustered file systems is the first/best example that
> comes to mind. Host A and Host B can both request from diskfarm, eg.
Something like a Global File System?
http://www.redhat.com/software/rha/gfs/
(I believe some other company did develop it some time in the past; hmm, probably the guys doing LVM stuff?).
Anyway the idea is that two machines have same filesystem mounted and they share it. The locking I believe is handled by communication between computers using "host to host" SCSI commands.
I never used it, I've only heard about it from a friend who used to work with it in CERN.
Regards,
Dawid
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Turner | 2005-04-20 17:04:04 | Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-20 16:39:33 | Re: Opteron vs Xeon (Was: What to do with 6 disks?) |